Pages: Prev 1 2 3 ...53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 Next

Alabama AG Requests New Execution Date

Alabama Attorney General Troy King said the Supreme Court’s action today was not unexpected and his office immediately requested a new execution date for Arthur.
King said “it’s just a shame that Tommy Arthur continues to benefit from delays that have kept him on death row for far, far too long.” Arthur received a death sentenced for killing 35-year-old Troy Wicker of Muscle Shoals in 1982.
King asked the Alabama Supreme Court to set execution dates for three other death row inmates last week following the Kentucky ruling.

ALABAMA Voices: injustice injustice

I was in fourth grade and walking on my country, the school one morning, if this type in the eighth grade came, pulled a knife on me and said he had fourth. I had 30 cents on me.

Let me say that I have disarmed, worked around him and told him never to interfere with me or someone else. I did it. I am flowing over the quarter. And I said: ‘Why are you doing, Joe? ”

“Two reasons,” he said. “I need him and you do not, and I have a knife and you do not understand.” I could discuss, the first step, but the second was indisputable and convincing. But actually, he was right on both. His family was poor, was not me.

From there, I always have a great search of him. It does happens again, but I’ve never told anyone, and I’ve never received more unjust, as it was. And he, who was for most of my birthdays, never invited.

The fact that a little, and I had quite a lot done right at all to take a knife, Rob and me? Most people would say not. It is not true.

But that’s shadow to Alabama in connection with litigation against pharmaceutical companies and cooked desperately unfair oil allowance new controls to fight against the rules of Exxon Mobil in Alabama now the legislative power. They do their heritage any right to violate them?

Right here, right now, I tell you that voters in Alabama against the abuse of the process is in the uncomfortable position of defending some of the biggest companies in big business. Each member of the Avala’s Board of Directors of small businesses to show, almost all the inhabitants of Avala the mailing list of more than 15000 enterprises are small trailers.

It gives our powerful enemies, Alabama’s Trial lawyers injury, a platform and attack Avala. But injustice, injustice, the State attempts pilfer deep pockets are incorrect.

What Alabama citizens may not recognize is that Trial Lawyers “Robin Hood” system against deep-pocket businesses are finally rob jobs, health care availability and reduce the filtering of economic development in areas that need it most.

In these types of systems, “Hood” in the ruler walks away up to half of the costs.

And this is not only Avala against this tax. Some of Alabama’s biggest and best newspapers think the unfair tax allowance, as Dr. David Dismukes, Professor, Associate Executive Director and head of policy analysis at Louisiana State University.

“An increase of value added tax perspective, this proposal would be Alabama’s takeover of taxation in effective tax rate highest of all producers of natural gas in the country. The current proposal, investment in production facilities natural gas Ala., and that growth long-term capital investments, future production of the waters of the State “A Dismukes said.

Declarations of pressure on the new charge against Exxon Mobil have an oily feel to them. Exxon Mobil has recently won a court appoints a refund of taxes to the tune of $ 41 million in Alabama a judge of administrative law on the means. The State has the company of the request. The company said no.

Incredible, by chance, and, ironically, the new tax, taxes on natural gas of $ 40 million.

Incredible, by chance, and, ironically, the State, for which he is not tempted to relocate the company’s assertions, but it would be the reduction of new taxes, if the company reduced demand.

Association and the Alabama Education in Post Secondary It Again

Stay informed by the minute. Sign up for Breaking News and we are working to ensure that the e-mails WSFA 12 News.

Talk to WSFA 12 News About this story

Two years at college employees to keep an eye for some form in your e-mail soon. The form is the Department of Post Secondary Education permission to use your Social Insurance Number examine thoroughly criminal, but the AEA is not happy.

The struggle is how the reliability checks will be done. If a law, that the road by the legislature passed, it is necessary to criminal background checks for all current and new employees in K-through-12 and post secondary education.

AEA insists on the bill, which require reliability checks to be done, the Alabama Bureau of Investigation fingerprint. Post Secondary But already signed an agreement with a private company to do its audits of reliability with a staff member’s name and social insurance number. But AEA complaint alleges that social security numbers go to a private company is an invasion of privacy. However, Wednesday afternoon, the two parties reached an agreement that workers must have a two-year College system for authorising the use of his social insurance number.

Full power to arrest him Edward said: “What we have tried, as now, was the requirements of the Privacy Act requires that people that view and say that they voluntarily agree for privacy on their interest and social insurance number. “Counsel for post-secondary, Roger Bates, said:” The experts were hired by post secondary we have indicated that a search without social insurance numbers. It is difficult, and it is more time, because we are not yet a name ID are associated with a certain conviction reported. So, it is followed by some necessary I am quite sure. ”

The bill, background checks, the ABI to make fingerprints in a Senate committee Wednesday morning. When it comes to full Senate and the governor has been approved a lawyer told the reliability of controls could begin as early as May 8.

Another law was passed in the Senate Committee on another tomorrow, Wednesday, a Board of Education separated for two school years.

Rove ‘hijacked’ the Dept. of Justice to win elections

In a broad interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., former Alabama Dir Don Siegelman, the licensee of prison retirement indices in the last month in anticipation of a complaint by his conviction on corruption charges, debt, for its crackdown on Karl Rove ” abduction “of the Federal Department of Justice.

“It is not me, this is not my business,” said Siegelman in his appearance on Air America’s Ring of Fire, a show of Kennedy and Mike Papantonio GoLeft.tv available online. “This is America, and a quest that must now continue to determine who was responsible for the abduction of the Department of Justice and as a political tool to win elections. I think the person that the Congress will ultimately responsible for Karl Rove.

Siegelman is worth noting that prior warning Republican Dana Jill Simpson directly involved Rove: “I’m suspected of such indices that Karl Rove was deeply in my prosecution. I think it was so obvious that it was easy for me, for two and two together and attach these points. ”

“I grew up with your father as Attorney General,” said Siegelman Kennedy, “and the heroic deeds he has done, and you know you’ve always thought that the Department of Justice was the last place you can watch it for Justice and Fair Play. But I think Karl Rove has learned two things from Watergate. … He learned that you do not have the creation of a secret unit of piping within the White House, if you had the Department of Justice. If only the right of appointing U.S. attorneys, could you do the same thing and much more. And second, what I think Rove has learned, you do not leave after that Nixon is satisfied with his band. Delete e-mails. ”

Siegelman clear its conviction to the expression, while the corruption investigation launched against him by a Republican State Attorney General federal only a few weeks after his swearing in as governor in May 1999, began as a matter of local politics , Once the Bush administration taking office, it was something much bigger. Until then, Siegelman Star has been a Governor and Democrats, after losing his bid for election in 2002, he was increasingly visible from a critic of the administration. It was a sufficient reason for wanting Rove, take it down.

To support his argument, he immediately that the highest levels of the Department of Justice, Siegelman cited the participation of several high-placed figures. One was Noel Hillman, former head of the public in the integrity of the division, the Kennedy described as “a ramp federal judge in Camden, New Jersey, is one of the other people, completely destroyed the democratic process in our country and taken the Department of Justice … And it has turned into a market policy to stifle the laws and imprisonment of political opponents. ”

After Siegelman, Hillman has done several times in Alabama were in favour of repression, in an era where there had to wonder if they would be or not to proceed with the case. He called the U.S. attorneys in Washington and They were told, and a high throw down the Verification of Siegelman case, if they had lost their first race on me during the year 2004.

Another was Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, visited the USA Attorney Leura Canary, Alabama after the first case against Siegelman was thrown by judges and away from criticism of its failure, has offered its strong support. “Shortly after the event by the USA was a lawyer in Birmingham, is a close friend of Karl Rove social, Alberto Gonzales, Ala., a standing ovation for him and his pat on the back and on board and tell what a great citizen of the USA, she was the lawyer. ”

Siegelman also noted that if the government witnesses, preparation, Siegelman against a full hall said the Department of Justice representatives also made cash and blank cheques to two prominent Republicans - former Attorney General William Pryor and Senator Jeff Sessions - “Not a word has been said and nothing has been done.”

“For each of these people had a conflict and must be strengthened from this space at that time,” says Siegelman. “It cries selective repression, but also cries, considers that the roof of protecting these people, so she felt comfortable in this context in which they can be, without doubt against the canons of ethics But maybe against a law, and subverted because of my right to a fair trial? “

Alabama prisoner condemned to death the protocol in question, who dies

Montgomery, Ala. (AP) - The death of cells of detainees, the Alabama’s demanding method of lethal injection died Tuesday of complications of cancer appear, officials said.

Prison System Brian Corbett, spokesman, said Daniel Siebert, 53, was pronounced dead at 1:35 pm in Holman Prison near Atmore, where he was still carrying out more than 21 years for strangling four people.

Siebert, describes himself a serial killer, was also known for drawings in black, which were offered for sale on the theme “murderabilia” Web sites specializing in works of art, letters and essays convicted murderers.

Corbett said the exact cause of death would be determined later Siebert, but seems related to his cancer of the pancreas.

“He probably hoped to die of cancer before it has been,” said Esther Brown, director of Project Hope, abolish the death penalty.

Siebert died in less than a week after the U.S. Supreme Court has the most widespread method of lethal injection, can be read on the request to proceed with the executions after a nearly seven months.

There was one death row several inmates demanding method Alabama, but his costume was unique because he said his medication against cancer would be contrary to the injection of lethal drugs, and inflict unnecessary pain.

Siebert was convicted on February 19, 1986, strangulation of his friend of 24 years, Sherri Weathers, and his two son, 5 years, Chad and 4 years, Joey. He was also separately, and sentenced to death for killing a neighbor in his apartment complex Talladega, Linda Jarman, the same night.

Siebert has been to life imprisonment for murder Linda Faye Odum, including Talladega. It has led to a number of other murders from California to New Jersey, but the exact number of victims is unknown.

Siebert has come within one day of lethal injection in October before a federal appeals court has stayed the execution until the Supreme Court delivered its judgement in Kentucky.

Alabama Attorney General Troy King said Siebert death should be “to end years of legal, stupidity, has disappeared.”

“It is a shame, he got what he wanted, but people who were brutally executed him blind in this case and this is never injustice,” said the king.

Major to address Alabama legislature on BRAC

The commander of the Army Aviation and Missile Command at Redstone Arsenal will address a joint session of the Alabama Legislature on Tuesday for help in recruiting thousands of high-tech workers and contractors to Huntsville.

Major General James Myles is seeking the help recruiting workers as part of the federal Base Realignment and Closure Commission’s actions.

In 2005, the BRAC Commission decided to shift three major Army command headquarters, most of the Missile Defense Agency and helicopter work to Redstone from areas around Washington, D.C.

Riley policy reasons, others by Goff

Montgomery Insurance Executive John W. Goff, for over a fraud charge fees of Confederation by a Grand Jury, said the indictment against him, for its policy of reprisals against the use Gov. Bob Riley, and others. Goff, said the charge “a rehash a previous complaint against him.

“The case has been tried, governmental and judicial schlichtete federal and New York and on the basis of facts and witnesses, consisting in the registers. Charges in the indictment and has been trying to cover all the years “Goff said in a written statement.

The US Attorney’s office in Montgomery in a press release last week, said a federal grand jury charged Goff with the e-mail fraud, embezzlement, conspiracy and making false statements to the regulatory authorities State insurance. The 26-count indictment alleges that Goff fraudulently collected $ 3 million in workers’ compensation insurance premiums for both insurance companies, but not companies, their share of the premiums. Advertisement

“Goff, bonuses and spent the money for his personal expenses, including salaries skyrocketing cost of his lifestyle, Corporate aircraft and real estate,” said the citizen of the United States Franklin lawyer Louis. “This is just an old trap of greed.”

Computers Goff, the whole issue was thrown into a written agreement on there, in Alabama in 2005 by the Department of Insurance, an assistant Alabama Attorney General and approved by an Administrative Law Judge.

“I thought until now that the whole affair was behind us,” said Goff. As a result of the agreement language Goff, says it released “all claims, demands, costs, procedures, damages, demands, complaints and costumes of any kind or nature in connection with the theme of matterof the administrative court of appeal. ”

Franklin does call his response to requests Goff. Franklin is the case of manipulation, because US Attorney Leura Goff is recused Canaries.

Display Goff filed in Montgomery County Circuit Court thirteen months against Gov. Bob Riley, his son, Rob Riley, the former Lt. Gov. Steve Windom National Insurance Commissioner Walter A. Bell and connects two Windom. The suit alleges that the defendants made to blackmail $ 200000 Goff, and the control of its once lucrative insurance business. If the ground is not blackmail, the suit takes account of the accused, and then destroy Goff, financially and go on in the store.

Goff’s lawyer in connection with civil litigation, Thomas T. Montgomery III Gallion, said the indictment against his client “is an attempt to intimidate Goff, and our action in civil matters.”

“They released (Goff) of such rights. Absolutely, it’s twice as much at risk, “said Gallion

Siegelman case stirs souls of Republican, Democratic partisans

The recent decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to release pending appeal Don Siegelman has added fuel to the fire ignited by the CBS 60 minutes documentary featuring Siegelman’s case and imprisonment. Even though it has been six weeks since the documentary was broadcast, the coffee shop and Internet chatter continues. It seems to have stirred the souls of partisans on both sides.

The hardcore hardcore Democrats and Republicans have come out of the closet and gone to the wall on this topic. Both sides have legitimate arguments, but at the end of the day nothing changes about Don Siegelman’s dilemma. He still faces seven years in a federal prison. However, the appeals court ruling in the language gives hope to Siegelman. It will be a year before the final adjudication of the appeal is rendered.

After the program aired, Siegelman attorney’s called for the Justice Department to bring in a special prosecutor to retry the case. The motion was based on Siegelman’s former aide, Nick Bailey, coached him saying prosecutors and coaxed him out into writing his testimony 70 times in order to get it right. The defense was not privy to these notes as is required by law.

Those who know Nick Bailey suggest that his propensity for truthfulness and honesty are not something you should hang on a your. Siegelman this convicted in large part because of Bailey’s testimony. Bailey has now changed his story several times while in prison. In fact, the female attorney who was interviewed in the feature and stated that she was asked by Karl Rove to photograph a Siegelman compromising the position appeared to lack credibility. The Republican Party quickly debunked credentials and her veracity. However, the Republican former Attorney General of Arizona gave the story some legs. He appeared steady, dark, and credible when he said Siegelman’s prosecution and conviction had red flags all over it. When he stated that Siegelman was prosecuted for political reasons it gave some gravitas to the story. That is not an earth shattering revelation. It was obvious that the Republican administration had targeted for Siegelman scrutiny. He was constantly under investigation for eight years. It is surprising that he was indicted not more than he was. The bar for indicting someone is a lot lower than legally for conviction. It is often said that if you could indict a potato a prosecutor wanted to badly enough.

Was it wrong to go after Siegelman legally for political reasons? The answer is yes, but unfortunately that is the political nature of the game today. The acrimony and mean is vitriol. It is not enough to defeat your opponent, today they want to destroy their opponent. It goes on in both parties. The Republicans have had the upper hand the last eight years having had control of the Justice Department. You can bet your boots that the Democrats are chomping at the bit to get back and get even if they take the White House next year. You will see wide ranging probes, indictments and convictions of Republican policies based solely on Alabama politics. I would not be surprised if you did not see a presidential pardon for Don Siegelman if a Democrat is elected President.

The Republicans have a valid point that the media appears to have a tendency to gravitate to a Democratic slant. The 60 Minutes broadcast was definitely slanted against Rove, the White House and the Republican Justice Department. However, the worst case of a smear campaign was illustrated by the New York Times in its sensational front page of John McCain ambush in February after he became the apparent Republican nominee.

The New York Times is renowned for being overly liberal and democratic, but their article was way beyond philosophical prejudice. Their involvement was that McCain having an improper affair with a female lobbyist was based on eight year old rumors that had no basis of fact. In fact, McCain’s office proved that they had not even gone too bat for the lady’s firm. All McCain had done was perfunctory write a letter asking the FCC to expedite a decision that should have been made six months earlier. This story was more than overzealous partisan journalism. It slammed yellow of journalism and makes them appear to be nothing more than a tabloid. It puts the New York Times and category in the league with the National Enquirer. You should take all political attacks with a grain of salt and a jaundiced eye.

Alabama judge rule promptly, to $ 63 million in budget dispute

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - A judge heard arguments from Montgomery, in the proceedings may result in a $ 63 million hole in the public funds for the general budget.

Circuit Judge William Shashy heard lawyers talk Thursday on an appeal, that the businessman Stan sponsor Tuscaloosa against Gov. Bob Riley.

Godfather of lawyers, “said Riley wounded from the State, if the Constitution has $ 63 million coming from the state budget of Exxon Mobil in litigation fund general condition. She said that the money, it is in a state known as a savings account Alabama Trust Fund.

Assistant Attorney General Corey Mazerolle said Riley was on the Constitution. Maze, “said the Alabama Trust Fund receives royalties, $ 63 million of charges was not.

Circuit Judge William Shashy said he will try next week to the rule, because the legislature needs to know if the budget of reference is concerned.

Alabama Sen. E.B. McClain runs on theft warrant

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - The state Democratic Senator EB McClain midfielder has decided not to wait until the current legal situation reunion ends at himself before the primary level to ensure the flight.

McClain appeared with his lawyer, at the end of Jefferson County Jail on Thursday afternoon and was transferred on loan.

A guarantee of McClain’s arrest on a first-degree theft of fees was issued last week, but prosecutors said she would Senator, to register for the current session of the legislature ends in May. McClain’s lawyer, John Robbins, said the senator decided to continue with cost management.

The flight fees stems from the State a grant of $ 65000, was awarded to a non-profit organization, the Community Resource Centre. The founder of the group, the Rev. Saturday Pettagrue, was also charged.